Tiger Ops - Latest Comments

Re: XML+CSS: The future of Web Design?

revitmedia — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 01:04:08 -0000

Excellent blog, thanks for the post!

Re: An Alley-OOP for If

footballworldcuptickets — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:51:28 -0000

Your blog post is too nice of football. If you want good entertainment and want to get enjoyment of live matches of pool then get Arsenal Tickets in online market for more enjoyment of holidays.

Re: wxRuby for the Lazy

Dave — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:20:29 -0000

Now if only this code actually worked, it would be an even better article:

C:\Dev\Ruby>ruby wxTest.rb
wxTest.rb:145:in `on_init': uninitialized constant Controller::Service (NameError)
from wxTest2.rb:165:in `main_loop'
from wxTest2.rb:165

Re: wxRuby for the Lazy

Grany — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:56:07 -0000

Thanks for the article! It helps a lot! YOu are great!

Re: wxRuby for the Lazy

shinobisword — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:15:23 -0000

whoa this is really a nice article, this software will help the lazy one LOL

Re: Facets Associations

shinobisword — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:13:16 -0000

thanks for providing this code, i appreciated this a lot. i will always look forward for your useful post.

Re: The YADSL Rule

shinobisword — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:07:14 -0000

with the highspeed of technology we need to keep ourselves in track in order to be in tact in a place where you are now.

Re: GUtopIa Revisted

rogerdpack — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:55:17 -0000

I wish there were a GUI that were simple, elegant, yet powerful, and also cross platform [oh and very ruby-y]. Oh and not buggy. Sigh.
-=r

Re: The YADSL Rule

trans — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:41:51 -0000

Good idea! Make it 20%, then maybe we can prove that the YADSL rule is just a corollary of the 80/20 rule. Though I'm not sure how that would work.

Re: The YADSL Rule

kevlaw — Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:19:33 -0000

We talked about this very idea at #ostatli yesterday.

New rule:

Your new DSL/library/framework has to be at least 10% better than the old one or I am not going to even consider it.

Re: Tiger Ops - This Old Hash

josh — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:18:25 -0000

I agree with your perspective on this, but there's a hitch. The reason Rails uses HashWithIndifferentAccess is to prevent resource exhaustion attacks via query param fuzzing. Strings are garbage collected, symbols are not. It's not an ideal solution, but it beats letting some script-kiddie take down your web app.

Re: Tiger Ops - This Old Hash

Robert Dober — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:28:10 -0000

Nice writing Tom
Indeed simplicity might be the key here ;). What about having a SymbolTable in Facets?

x = SymbolTable::new

x[:a] = 42
x["a"'] # --> 42

s = Object::new
class << s; def to_sym; :a end end
x[s] # --> 42

x[3] = 19

x.symbols -> [ :a, :"3"]

##################################

y = SymbolTable::new :strict
y[3] = 17 # Error 3 not allowed as a key in a strict StymbolTable

Cheers
Robert

Re: Tiger Ops - Facets Hash#rekey

semanticart — Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:07:00 -0000

I'm looking forward to this series. I'm a huge fan of facets. I don't know how I'd live without each_slice...

You should also update your blog template as your embedded rss feed doesn't resolve. I found the feedburner link, but you might want to fix that path.

Cheers

Re: Tiger Ops - Taskable

trans — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:48:35 -0000

Pardon the noise. I just added Disqus comments to my blog and I wanted to test them out.